Archives
June 2010
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
October 2006
September 2006
May 2006
March 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
April 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
|
Cut out BPA use or risk market exclusion, urges new report
Food Navigator.com
April 22, 2009
By Jane Byrne
The report Seeking Safer Packaging has been released by Green Century Capital Management, an investor in environmentally sound companies, and As You Sow, an advocate group for corporate responsibility.
It claims that 14 of the largest public packaged food and beverage companies still use the controversial packaging chemical in their packaging despite studies linking it to developmental problems, heart disease and diabetes. Consumer concern Rising consumer concern about the chemical led the six largest baby bottle manufacturers to announce last month that they would phase out BPA from all bottles sold in the US.
And last autumn, Canada became the first country in the world to take regulatory action to prohibit the use of BPA in baby bottles; bills are currently under consideration in several US states that aim to ban the use of the chemical in products aimed at children under the age of three. However, the food safety regulators in both the US and the EU maintain that there is no risk to consumer health through exposure to BPA in packaging at current levels. Safer alternatives Green Century said it asked 20 publicly-traded companies what actions they are taking to respond to concerns regarding BPA, and of the 14 companies that responded, the report found that all but four had failed to develop safer alternatives, and only one company had begun using a substitute. The report awarded top scores to Hain, Celestial, Heinz, and Nestle based on the fact that these companies, it claims, have researched and tested alternatives to BPA and because they plan to phase out the chemical in some products.
According to the report, Heinz is the only respondent already using a substitute to BPA in some of its can linings. "Green Century is very concerned about the lack of urgency with which the packaged food industry is addressing BPA," states Larisa Ruoff, director of shareholder advocacy at Green Century. "Alternatives to BPA exist for many products. We believe companies should implement all feasible alternatives and increase investments into substitute can linings for all products, including highly-acidic foods." The investors said that the other companies contacted were Campbell Soup, Coca-Cola, ConAgra, Chiquita, Dean Foods, Del Monte, General Mills, Hershey, Hormel, JM Smucker, Kellogg, Kraft, McCormick, PepsiCo, Sara Lee, Sysco, and Unilever.
NOTICE: In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving this information for research and
educational purposes.
|